Wikijunior talk:Solar System/Kuiper Belt

Sources.
extends from Neptune's orbit [1]

to aproximately 3 billion km beyond it (to about 50 AU (~7.4 billion km - 30 AU ~4.5)) [1][30]

contains objects of icy material [30]

with organic compounds

What are they named after?
Orcus [50]

Charon [51]

Quaoar [52]

Varuna [53]

Ixion [54]

- Except for sources indicated below, the 2004-11-26t01:30z version of the English Wikipedia article was used. Please add better sources.

The fact that it was discovered at the Mauna Kea Observatory in Hawaii [0] might be used if we use the Kiki/Niki character:

[0] 2005-03-15t06:51z version of (15760) 1992 QB1.

[1] Arnett, Bill. The nine planets: a multimedia tour of the solar system. The Kuiper belt and the Oort cloud, paragraph 5. 2004-03-15 http://www.nineplanets.org/kboc.html as accessed on 2005-09-25.

[30] Jewitt, David. Kuiper belt, paragraph 1. http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/kb/kb.con.html as accessed on 2005-09-25.

[50] 2005-02-13t00:28z version of 90482 Orcus.

[51] 2005-02-15t01:55z version of Charon (moon), and the 2005-02-14t19:26z version of Charon (mythology).

[52] 2005-03-05t19:32z version of 50000 Quaoar.

[53] 2005-03-04t14:04z version of Varuna.

[54] 2005-03-18t22:51z version of Ixion.

it would appear that we have some more
what is the cut off point for this page and what are we going to do about UB313 ?

Edits not made because of proofreading restrictions.
I saw that astronomers is spelled astronmomers but I dare not correct for fear of being arrested by the bureaucracy that seems to rule this place. Has homeland security taken over wiki?

af:Gebruiker:Jcwf 152.1.193.141 20:17, 18 September 2005 (UTC)


 * If you can help, please do. We could certainly use the help!  I don't understand about bureaucracy, rule, FEMA, and this wikibook.  --SV Resolution 23:13, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

In the 1st paragraph I suggest we add "aproximately" to distance, and replace "lumps" ("objects"? or something simpler to understand?).&mdash; Jeandré,2005-09-25t12:25z

Charon in the belt
In the Pluto article they decided to make Pluto a planet so we probably shouldn't call it a Kuiper Belt object here for the purposes of internal consistancy.--Gbleem 19:20, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Pluto and its moons are KBOs and TNOs - I don't think this is disputed. Some agree with the IAU that it is a (major) planet also, some do not. I wonder how the translation/localizing of the articles will handle this, with non English versions maybe putting much less emphasis to the continued planet definition. &mdash; Jeandré, 2005-11-11t19:36z