Wikijunior talk:Languages/Lojban

Doubts about the notability of Lojban
It's not clear whether Lojban should be included in this book. The general issue of conlang inclusion has been raised &mdash;and I recently made a comment that mentioned Lojban specifically&mdash; here. --Pi zero (talk) 18:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That's true; however for sakes and  exist and are Lojban wikis. — I-20  the highway  18:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)


 * That's relevance for a wikibook targeted at an adult audience. Worthiness for inclusion here is something different.


 * Esperanto and Quenya both have the potential for inspiring stories for kids, in their history sections, about how their creator started as a kid and kept at it their whole life. There's some hope for Klingon, because there's fun in it that can appeal to kids; and that fun can make kids think about the relationship between language and patterns of thought.  I think there are head-count and cultural-mainstream problems with Lojban, but what I'm having most trouble with is that I don't see anything about it that's inspiring to the WJ audience.  Anything fun about it is not a sort of fun that will appeal to kids.  It wasn't started by someone when they were a kid.  Is there a way to make it fun?  --Pi zero (talk) 18:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)