Wikibooks talk:Resolving disputes/Unstable

Striving for simplicity
I think the problem with setting up an arbitration board and such is that it's just not all that easy to rally up a group of actors on wikibooks. The goal of this version of the policy is to allow for quick and efficient resolution without having to drag the whole project into a big row.

My hope is that it would go like this:
 * 1) An impasse is reached, and outside opinions are sought and given
 * 2) If the opinions aren't enough to get the 2 parties to reach an accord, it goes to moderation.
 * 3) The moderator makes his or her decision, announces it, and enforces it.
 * 4) If uninvolved parties think the decision is unfair, it should be reviewed, and changes made to the decision is there is a consensus to do so.
 * 5) The matter is closed, though it can be reviewed after a good long cooling off period, and any restrictive measures looked at to see if they are still necessary.

-- SB_Johnny | talk 17:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)