Wikibooks talk:NPOV dispute

Initial text adapted from en:Wikipedia:NPOV dispute --mav 00:55, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC)

A way of dealing with NPOV disputes
If there are biased points of view, each with valid points, perhaps it would be instructive to let the reader decide by presenting all points of view and allowing the reader to evaluate the merits of each case. Absorption of multiple valid points of view can be most instructive in my understanding, if each point of view is presented with rational thought, clear reasoning, and careful evidence.

Make this page a unstable version of Neutral point of view
I have some small simplification edits to the text, if no one objects I will attempt to further determine what has been said about the subject on project see if this text diverges from what is stated on the above source of the text and move it into a unstable branch of the Neutral point of view policy (or similar action). As it is its partial duplicating the policy (even if offers a consistent and more actual approach to the issue). --Panic (talk) 05:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC)