Wikibooks talk:Language and literature bookshelf

Organization
I notice that there's a mixed organization scheme here, unless "law" is an author.कुक्कुरोवाच

Not Yet Annotated
Shouldn't this page have sections "Annotated" "Partially annotated"? (never "To be annotated" as raw source text should not be here; if someone wants something annotated then they at least should be able to add their own annotations before uploading here)

Annotation conflict
There seem to be two lists of annotated works. On the Main Page is a link here, but this list is different from the list of annotated works at Study guide bookshelf.

Cleanup
I've cleaned up this list, and added notices to all the pages, redirecting readers to texts on wikisource. Basejumper123 00:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Suggestion
It would be useful to offer some annotated texts as a two column text. In other words, one column would have the original text, while the other column would have useful notes, ideas, and/or explanations. This has become prominent in some versions of Shakespeare, for example, where the left page of the book is the original text, while the right side is the original text translated into Modern English. I would be more than happy to develop a template for this and to help develop some of the texts into this, just let me know what you think. --Ultimadesigns 02:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Practical Grammar and Composition
The following out-of-copyright book has just been posted to Project Gutenberg:



It's outdated in a number of places, but much of the content is still relevant. So it might serve as a framework for a work on Wikibooks; needing only updates to the obsolete content and some modernized examples and rules of grammar. What do you think? &mdash; RJHall 14:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No interest I guess. &mdash; RJHall 22:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)