Wikibooks:Requests for permissions/Sonia

+Reviewer
From the whopping 28 non-deleted edits I have, I think it's clear I've got a fair understanding of vandalism and the deletion policy, and from my interwiki tribs that I can be trusted. In all honesty, I don't forsee myself actively building content on this project in the near future, but I think that my getting the right now will only save reviewers some time before I accumulate the hundred necessary. (And I don't collect rights and leave projects- my second edit to simplewp was requesting rollback, but I'm now an active admin there. :P) Sonia (talk) 22:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Yes_check.svg|15px| ]] Done. Well, I can see your deleted contributions. Most of your work has been tagging pages for deletion and then warning the users.  I'm afraid reviewer rights won't be of much assistance in those two cases.  Reviewer, however, will allow you to roll back vandalism and encourage you to branch out into handling pages pending review.  Given that you're a sysop/'crat at the flagged revisions test wiki, I can have faith that you'll know how to use the system.  The bottom line is that the reviewer flag is for those who know what they're doing and what is acceptable content at Wikibooks and have proven that they are good faith contributors.  I'll venture to state that you qualify. – Adrignola talk 22:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)