Wikibooks:Requests for permissions/RamaccoloBot

+Bot
I'd like RamaccoloBot to have the bot flag mainly for adding interwiki without flooding RC. It is active on it.wikibooks and fr.wikibooks where it has the bot flag. It uses the pywikipediabot framework. --Ramac (talk) 15:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Post scriptum: My bot made some edit as Ramac before (Special:Contributions/Ramac) and Mike suggested me to open a RFP (User talk:Ramac). --Ramac (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support - Thanks for separating this into a bot account. As you have experience with interwiki linking on Wikibooks, interwiki.py is safe, and the edits done previously were all fine, I'm happy to flag the account if you anticipate flooding RC (even intermittently, which I assume would be the case). – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 05:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Great Coder, he helped my a lot of time with PHP :)
 * --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 00:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * --Webaware talk 08:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * -(Red4tribe (talk) 00:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC))

✅ User:Derbeth has apparently already granted the flag for this user on 6 May. With the complete show of support above, I guess we just call it a permanent change. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 03:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, he talked to me on IRC on 6 May and granted the flag to the bot. Sorry for this, I thinked it was all ok --Ramac (talk) 13:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

-Bot

 * Operator: Ramac
 * Last bot activity: 19 March 2009
 * Last operator activity: 8 September 2009 (prior to that, 12 April 2009; prior to that, 3 February 2009)

This is an interwiki bot, which I have observed is hard to get approved these days due to the nature of Wikibooks. Beyond that, the bot has not been active for over a year and the operator is not very active. -- Adrignola talk contribs 12:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

I agree because the bot and its operator has been inactive for over a year and interwiki tasks are too complicated to be automated by a bot. bot policy does not require that this be discussed or have community support: "The bot flag can also be removed by local bureaucrats at their discretion if the bot has abused the extra rights, they are no longer needed or wanted, or if the bot is not actively used." --dark lama  12:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, well, I take it that that is my cue to "just do it". This shall serve as notice that the flag has been removed then. -- Adrignola talk contribs 13:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)