Wikibooks:Requests for permissions/MonoBot

+Bot
Bot to tag fair use images without a rationale. The bot will look for two things: the fair use rationale template OR any image with an extra text besides the. If it has these two things it will skip. Otherwise it will tag and notify the uploader. Monobi (talk) 01:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The bot will also notify users only once (ie no flooding of User talk: pages).
 * Since the code is ready, I've asked Monobi to do a test run of 10 images plus however many User talk: edits. – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 03:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Last few edits. I did some slight debugging with Mike on IRC and 1) the bot will only warn a user once (but will still tag the image anyways) and 2) will skip images with fair use rationales already. I can (most likely) add features, so just ask me. Monobi (talk) 04:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Hopefully we can get this bot flagged soon. :) --Az1568(Talk) 20:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This user has gone on a bit of a "spree" here, and has edited a number of images and user pages. He has flooded the RC list, and has demonstrated to people watching that his bot performs without serious bugs. I'm going to grant the bot flag here temporarily so that he doesnt flood the RC any further. I'll remove the flag again when he finishes for the night. With concensus here, we can opt to have the flag granted on a more permanent basis. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 00:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I was just about to suggest that he be temporarily flagged to get the edits off RC, and I will also support a permanent flag. Νεοπτόλεμος ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 00:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * the bot flag until this task is done. – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 15:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * --Webaware talk 21:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. I've seen this bot in action, and I can tell you that it can make many good edits very quickly. I just hope that the operator can find plenty of good jobs to do with it. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 22:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, you bet I can ;) Monobi (talk) 02:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

✅ -- Clear consensus for a bot that seems to be performing properly. -- SB_Johnny | PA! 03:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

-Bot
No longer active. Poses a risk if the account were to be hacked and not monitored by the owner. -- Adrignola talk contribs 17:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Last Contribution: March 15 2008
 * Operator's Last Contribution: June 13 2008

Unusual? Quite TalkQu 18:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ &mdash; Mike.lifeguard &#124; talk 15:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)