Wikibooks:Requests for permissions/Lord Voldemort

+Administrator
Okay, I realize this might be premature, but I feel it is the right time to ask. Hopefully in the following statements, I can calm any reservations about having me as a sysop. I don't see any official template to set up this nom, so I feel I can best express myself in this way.

Reasons I want to become an Admin:
 * The main reason I would like to be an Admin is to be able to rollback vandalism more effectively and efficiently.
 * I am an active participant in VfD, and would like to be able to complete the deletion process.
 * There doesn't seem to be enough Admins to keep up with vandal blocking and RC Patrol.

Possible reasons to vote Oppose:
 * Relative short time here on Wikibooks (Since November 2, 2005).
 * Relative low edit count compared to other Admins. (Roughly 420 edits as of 22:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)).
 * A couple of heated debates with fellow editors over policy (specifically content policies).

Possible reasons to vote Support:
 * Although I have only been here a month and a half, I know Wikibook editing and policies, and am a strong proponent of updating and enforcing certain policies... see my user page for more info.
 * Admin tools would not allow me to enforce any policy. I wouldn't "abuse my powers". Remember, almost all Admin actions can be undone anyways.
 * Adminship is supposed to be "no big deal", and I don't see it as such either.
 * I am dedicated to Wikibooks and want to make this project as best as it can be.
 * I am helpful to other editors, and am generally here M-F for a great portion of the day (420 edits in less than a month and a half).
 * I take part in RC Patrol and the rollback button would be helpful.
 * My use of edit summaries is superb and really helps when doing RC Patrol. I encourage everyone else to make sure they use their edit summaries.

Please just don't look at my name, remember me from the textbook debate, and vote oppose. Take some time in my contributions. If you feel you must vote oppose, I will understand. You are entitled to vote the way you please. I won't go away crying if this is unsuccesful. Thank you for taking the time to read through all of this. Feel free to ask me any questions you please. -- LV (Dark Mark) 22:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Votes
 * support LV is doing great job reverting vandals, he helped me many times. IMO we need people like LV - patrolling recent changes, reverting and blocking vandals, deleting unneccessary pages and generally doing the whole dirty job. I think LV is ready to become an sysop now. --Derbeth talk 22:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * support. you had me at hello. I have to admit, your credentials are much nicer then mine were when i asked for adminship, and on top of that, your little presentation here is certainly more impresive then mine was (mine was just like 1 paragraph). I think that wikibooks can only benefit from having more sysops in it's midst. -- 22:36, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Support I was going to wait until January to nominate you, but I think you are pretty familiarized with Wikibooks and everything going on here to take on this job. Becoming an admin is really not that big of a deal, you just have to prove you won't become a vandal and abuse the admin privileges and have a desire to help make this a much better project.  You have some strong opinions on some stuff here, and the best word of advise I can give is to simply be patient when you deal with other users.  We also need active admins here, and participating in the RC Patrol is especially welcome.  Admin privileges will allow you to take steps like blocking vandals early that you can't do otherwise.  --Rob Horning 11:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Support - What Rob Horning said. Your previous experience on Wikipedia has translated well to Wikibooks. The advancements in policy you've orchestrated here are especially helpful. -Matt 19:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Support --Cspurrier 19:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Support This user has worked at No personal attacks and No legal threats, and participates in other debates on policy, so I have a better idea of what to expect. This user seems to be very interested in Wikibooks. However, I did wonder if this user had any experience with adminship on another MediaWiki. --Kernigh 05:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Support --Krischik T 08:31, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Hey, I probably disagree the most with your opinions. But you know the difference between your opinion and the official policy, so I don't see it as a problem. --Dragontamer 05:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Done. Dysprosia 13:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

-Administrator
The below administrators have been inactive for one year or longer besides a few spare edits. These users have been contacted on their talk page as well as e-mailed if possible to inform them of this process. All users listed below will have their sysop rights removed on 8 Oct 2007 and a consensus decision is not needed; this section is serving to inform the community of their de-adminship and no discussion of current policy should occur here and instead at Wikibooks talk:Administrators. Should a nominated admin come back and contest the nomination, some discussion may occur and the once-admin will be able to re-apply for adminship at a later date. -within focus 01:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Request made today. -within focus 18:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ See here for the completed request. This should be archived in a few days. -within focus 17:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Last non-outlying edit 28 June 2006. This user (by viewing their edits) seems to have left all Wikimedia projects.