Wikibooks:Requests for permissions/Jianhui67

(Reviewer)
Hi! I would need the reviewer permission to revert vandalism and review others' edits. I have made more than 90 edits here. I have also done many mathematical codings as well. I would be making many edits related to mathematical codings and I think my edits can be automatically reviewed. I am a reviewer and rollbacker in English Wikipedia and I have rollback on several Wikimedia projects. By the way, am I close to autopromotion? Thanks. Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 12:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * A few edits away from autopromotion. Give it a couple of days (we need to leave the request open anyway as some people object to early granting) QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 14:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I already have more than 100 edits. But I'm not autopromoted. Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 14:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * QuiteUnusual, I have 118 edits now. But I'm not autopromoted. What do I lack? Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 10:33, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * By my count, you have exactly 100 content-space edits (3 in Wikijunior space and 97 in mainspace). At a guess, looking at the criteria for autopromotion, I suspect you're not yet up to "8 edits are spaced 2 or more days apart from each other (which takes at least 14 days, if you edit every 2 days)."  That one is hard to judge by eye, but I'm guessing you've got an edit on Feb 20, Feb 17, Sep 23, Sep 20, and Sep 17.  That's five, although, depending on exactly how the algorithm counts, edits later today could bring the number up to six.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 11:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note that the objective is not the edits counts by themselves but to give wikibookians time and experience on the project. It is just a way for the process to avoid granting automatically the rights to editors that could cause disruption. --Panic (discuss • contribs) 12:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. To be clear, we don't mean deliberate disruption; it's just a matter of having had breadth of experience on the project, as a stable foundation for ones' judgements when exercising the bit.  Since not having the reviewer bit doesn't seriously limit contribution, we allow people to accumulate that sort of breadth before they're autopromoted.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 13:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)