Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Yeshua and Kabbalah

Yeshua and Kabbalah
As per above. Original research and point of view problems. -- Adrignola talk contribs 01:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Assuming that the obvious tone and POV issues were dealt with, the contents were structured like a proper book and (ideally) there existed a book which covered Kabbalah (so that the material could have some sort of bigger context) there would be some hope of finding an use for the contents. Not that it looks like a likely scenario, but still... some of the references (not the external links) even appear to be reasonable sources in an NPOV context (the text does not make clear how they are used, though, which is a problem). On the other hand, the fact that the "book" is fully available at http://yeshuaandkabbalah.blogspot.com/ may not be particularly encouraging. --Duplode (talk) 03:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * It is also a bit disturbing the entire book popped into existence in a single edit. My guess would be by a copy and paste from a wikipedia article that was to be deleted, since it came complete with redlinks and citation tags. This seems further evidenced by the vast differences in writing style between sections.  Thenub314 (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * After a little investigating over at WP it seems this page was deleted at wikipedia for being straight forward OR. Reading the comments there has convinced me this is OR.   In addition this is clearly a copyvio, there is no longer an original page from which we can get an editors list who helped to improve the page.  These facts, together with the fact there is an exact copy at the authors blog makes me think this should go.  Thenub314 (talk) 09:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Thenub. Oh no, Wikpedia's switching to that bloody beta version. How sad. Kayau ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 10:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * , per Thenub's evidence. --Duplode (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2010 (UTC)