Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/World Records:Art and Media:Films

World Records:Art and Media:Films
This looks like total nonsense to me. --Ichiro 04:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment -- This is part of the World Records Wikibook, which had a discussion about this topic on Staff Lounge that is now archived here. Of course that was before the huge turmoil caused by Jimbo, so we may want to relook at this whole Wikibook.  --Rob Horning 17:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment References that I could find suggest that Indrasabha only has 71 songs, not "100+", so I changed World Records:Art and Media:Films to show this. I also introduced lowercase letters. --Kernigh 17:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because I voted for the deletion of the containing book. --Kernigh 20:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The page looks much more respectable now with Kernigh's edit. But is the containing book essentially a macropedia?  Whether a macropedia or not, the containing book is not a textbook.  --JMRyan 18:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I don't see why this entire book shouldn't get deleted. I think there is an important distinction between a macropedia and instructional resource and that this book isn't looking instructional. Several books including one I work on have a somewhat closeness to a macropedia but the books provide helpful information and analysis which I think proves their existence here. This looks like a dead project with no hinting of an attempt to provide instructional value. So far it looks like a big list. -Matt 15:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

This page was deleted because the entire book was subject to VfD and lost. I will archive this discussion in 1 week. --Whiteknight (talk) (current) 20:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)