Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Wikijunior:Big Cats/Caracal

Wikijunior:Big Cats/Caracal
Is a copyvio of. Isomorphic 03:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)


 * I think they're considered small cats, anyway, so a caracal page should probably not go there, to begin with. - Bulbaboy 04:23, 23 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep it I don't see what the issue is about small vs. large cats, and such a discussion should happen anyway within the Talk:Wikijunior Big Cats page rather than here.  If there is consensus that it is inappropriate to the overall objectives of that Wikibook, I would agree to delete it.  That discussion hasn't taken place, so this request to delete this page is inappropriate.  The copyright violation should be legitimately deleted, but that doesn't mean this article shouldn't exist.  Rob Horning 6 July 2005 12:43 (UTC)
 * I think the important point here is that the copyrighted material is still available from this site simply by requesting a previous revision of the article, and this is still a violation of copyright. This would be cured by deleting the article, and starting a fresh one. An even neater solution would be to merely delete the offending revisions from the DB. This is possible in CVS, but I don't know enough about the MediaWiki DB structure to know if it's possible). - Aya 8 July 2005 16:11 (UTC)


 * Delete, or remove the offending revisions only (see above). Also there is nothing substantial on this page right now, so it may be worth getting this sorted out before there is. - Aya 8 July 2005 16:11 (UTC)
 * Delete if copyvio, otherwise leave up to wikijunior contributors. Kellen 05:24, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Is is possible to delete only a page in the history (in this case of the copyright violation)? The stub seems to be just fine, and the copyright violation is no longer present.  The main Wikijunior Big Cats article does have a link to this page.  It would be easy to recreate anyway, so it is of no major importants, nor to preserve edit history so far. --Rob Horning 17:46, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Deleted offending revisions only - Didn't know if it was possible, but it is. :-) - Aya T C 21:08, 1 August 2005 (UTC)