Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/User:ハマスジャパン新聞

User:ハマスジャパン新聞
I am a Japanese wiki user and chasing so called "いせちか" vandal user. I saw an his user page. I'm going to apply speedy deletion for this vandal edit, but failed. So, I post this message. See details w:ja:LTA:ISECHIKA. Thank you. --Kyube (discuss • contribs) 03:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing this out to us. So far, it looks like that user has only created a user page that says some bizarre things in Japanese; it's not clear to me that they have done any harm on English Wikibooks (unless someone thinks the user page is harmful in itself; I don't understand the Japanese well enough to be sure).  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 04:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It's a long-term abuse account. I've locked it (Steward action) and, as we know the pages are always offensive, deleted the user page here. Thanks - QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The page implied Japanese famous persons (politician, actress, ...... etc.) concern terriorist groups Hamas (with no source). So he/she urge public to lose our and their fame.   --Kyube (discuss • contribs) 09:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Interesting. I'd sort of thought it was something like that; I'm interested to realize there's a cultural factor in my reaction to it.  At least here in the US, we tend not to get excited about these kinds of accusations against politicians, as criticism of politicians has a special need to be uncensored, where we might get more upset if the same thing were said about a civilian.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 12:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

A-level General Studies
I propose that this page should be deleted because it has no meaningful content. It only gives links to the examination structure of different specifications (these are the old specifications that were withdrawn in 2010!) and does not give ny information on the content of these units or anything else that would help people revise. Even if this page were updated to contain meaningful information on the current 2008 specifications, there would be no point since this specification is being withdrawn in summer 2017 and is not going to be replaced.
 * It's quite empty, so if it becomes obsolete in addition you're right, let's delete it. JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 00:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * as having no meaningful content, per WB:Deletion: "delete pages with no meaningful content" and "Abandoned pages displaying intent, but no actual content". It was in a similar state since 2005. In Special:Diff/435883, the "content" was on one page with less than 400 words. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 14:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC)