Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Time space causation

Time_space_causation
Very strange text - but I don't think it qualifies for a speedy delete. So lets make a quick vote about it. --Krischik T 19:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Doesn't belong on wikibooks if I know policy... but I don't know of another wiki this would belong to :-/ Wikisource maybe? Wikisource allows origonal sources... correct? --Dragontamer 22:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Wikisource only allows such work if it is previously published by users that are not contributors to Wikisource. They also certain technical data, but I think that Wikisource:Project:What is Wikisource? would exclude this. --Kernigh 22:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)T
 * Speedy delete - The text attempts to show that this world is a programmed simulation. The first few paragraphs some familiarity with the movie called The Matrix, so I had trouble understanding them. The remaining paragraphs feature spacetime vectors. This appears to be an original argument (not found outside Wikibooks), unless I should not believe it, in which case it is original fiction. Project:What is Wikibooks excludes both original research and original literature, so this module is a speedy deletion candidate. (I tried copying it to Time space causation, though.) --Kernigh 22:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete- the page is original research into philosophy, trying to equate space time physics with the Hindu/Buddhist concept of Mayah (the world as an illusion). It also looks like it may be a copyright violation, see the attribution at the bottom.  It does not make clear what is being attributed, and how much
 * Delete - If you have some doubt, there is no harm to change from delete to VfD. If it doesn't belong, it will go anyway.  This Wikibook module might be (really stretching the imagination here) one section of a more complete Wikibook about time travel.  It does read like fiction, so for that reason it doesn't belong on Wikibooks.  It also seems like it is a copyright violation.  I did find a web page that I listed on this module that may be a source for this text, and it certainly violates the no soapbox clause of WB:WIN.  --Rob Horning 00:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Original research. -- 04:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Terrible gibberish. --Derbeth talk 10:18, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Page has already been deleted, concensus was to delete. I will archive this discussion in 1 week. --Whiteknight (talk) (current) 15:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Time_space_causation
Very strange text - but I don't think it qualifies for a speedy delete. So lets make a quick vote about it. --Krischik T 19:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Doesn't belong on wikibooks if I know policy... but I don't know of another wiki this would belong to :-/ Wikisource maybe? Wikisource allows origonal sources... correct? --Dragontamer 22:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Wikisource only allows such work if it is previously published by users that are not contributors to Wikisource. They also certain technical data, but I think that Wikisource:Project:What is Wikisource? would exclude this. --Kernigh 22:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)T
 * Speedy delete - The text attempts to show that this world is a programmed simulation. The first few paragraphs some familiarity with the movie called The Matrix, so I had trouble understanding them. The remaining paragraphs feature spacetime vectors. This appears to be an original argument (not found outside Wikibooks), unless I should not believe it, in which case it is original fiction. Project:What is Wikibooks excludes both original research and original literature, so this module is a speedy deletion candidate. (I tried copying it to Time space causation, though.) --Kernigh 22:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete- the page is original research into philosophy, trying to equate space time physics with the Hindu/Buddhist concept of Mayah (the world as an illusion). It also looks like it may be a copyright violation, see the attribution at the bottom.  It does not make clear what is being attributed, and how much
 * Delete - If you have some doubt, there is no harm to change from delete to VfD. If it doesn't belong, it will go anyway.  This Wikibook module might be (really stretching the imagination here) one section of a more complete Wikibook about time travel.  It does read like fiction, so for that reason it doesn't belong on Wikibooks.  It also seems like it is a copyright violation.  I did find a web page that I listed on this module that may be a source for this text, and it certainly violates the no soapbox clause of WB:WIN.  --Rob Horning 00:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Original research. -- 04:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Terrible gibberish. --Derbeth talk 10:18, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Page has already been deleted, concensus was to delete. I will archive this discussion in 1 week. --Whiteknight (talk) (current) 15:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)