Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/The Use of English with Other Members of the Thai Academic Community among Dhurakij Pundit University.E2.80.99s Postgraduate Business Students

The Use of English with Other Members of the Thai Academic Community among Dhurakij Pundit University’s Postgraduate Business Students
This scope of this book is too specific to be used as a textbook. Also, reading the abstract, this very much sounds like original research. Overall I do not feel it is suitable for inclusion. Thenub314 (talk) 09:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * A worthy project, but certainly more suited to Wikiversity, in my humble opinion. Chazz (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Someone can transwiki if they like, but I say for WB it's OR and not suitable. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 09:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The more recently "Icon usage" to my understanding was to remove this ambiguity, and prevent confusing opinions toward saving valid content. Transwiki includes the deletion of the content here on Wikibooks but permits its survival elsewhere, opting for simple deletion means you feel that the proposed transwiki is not beneficial or that the work has no worth and can be lost. This distinction will be important for the contributors and can help other projects (some works have came to Wikibooks on the same grounds), hope you understand the implications...
 * A solid consensus on transwiki also presses the acting administrator on doing both steps, I don't know the common practice but I expect some minority opinions for traswiki to just be ignored.  --Panic (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * There may be no suitable project to Transwiki it to. I favour deleting as not suitable for Wikibooks. If there is a transwiki opinion then an impending doom can be added. An Admin here can't transwiki - that requires an Admin on the receiving project to do it and we shouldn't be hosting unsuitable content indefinitely on the hope that someone outside the project is willing to come along at some point and transwiki it. Just my view. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 20:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with that view, but you have to consider that it seem there is a project that would be ideal for the content, the last edits (content) were done in November 2009 and even with our low level of administrators we should have someone who is also an admin at Wikiversity... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panic2k4 (discuss • contribs)
 * I posted a request at Wikiversity:Import. We do have an admin here who is custodian at Wikiversity.  Two actually, that I know of offhand&mdash;darklama and SB Johnny.  Maybe the custodians at Wikiversity don't want it either, however. -- Adrignola talk contribs 05:50, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I noticed that the main contributor has a valid email and have emailed him. This is something that should probably be added to the deletion policy as a requirement for a RFD on valid content that is thought unfit for Wikibooks (I don't think it is often the practice. I have only done so 2 or 3 times in the past). I also have advanced in the past the idea to add other functions that Wikibookians have on Wikimedia into the administrators list and as a necessary declaration on accepting nominations, since this type of information is not easily accessible and is often useful to the community. --Panic (talk) 08:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * to Wikiversity. Not proper content for Wikibooks but worth salvaging. --Panic (talk) 20:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * All above agree that it's content not suitable for Wikibooks. It's been three weeks since I posted the import request at Wikiversity and nothing has been noted as to whether it will or will not be imported.  Whether another project wishes to pick it up is up to them, but we have to be concerned about our policies and content here.  Impending doom added to book. -- Adrignola talk contribs 17:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

The pages have been |transwiki imported to wikiversity. Please let me know if I missed anything. Are the original authors still active? They should be noticed of the new location. --mikeu (talk) 17:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- Adrignola talk contribs 18:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)