Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Supervisor Nuts and Bolts

Supervisor Nuts and Bolts
This has been sitting as simply an outline for a very long time, and shows no signs of progressing into a book. Thenub314 (talk) 09:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Symbol keep vote.svg Keep It needs to be categorized properly, so potential contributors will find it; but being an abandoned stub isn't grounds for deletion if it's a potentially useful abandoned stub.  (Cf. Swift's comment in the current VfD on The Old Man and the Sea.)  --Pi zero (talk) 12:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That assumes a person agrees with Swift. -- Adrignola talk contribs 12:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * My intention was only to imply that what Swift said about that book, I consider substantially applicable to this one. We're clearly struggling here lately to find some sort of heuristic, at least, for where to draw the line on keeping abandoned stubs; and I think potentially useful is a good test to include in such a heuristic.  Just because I like the test doesn't mean I necessarily agree with Swift's test-result judgment on The Old Man and the Sea, and in fact I'm still on the fence about that.  However, my own test-result judgment on Supervisor Nuts and Bolts favors keeping, hence my vote.  --Pi zero (talk) 13:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Comment Category and classifications added. This can be compared with other books in Category:Management, which is where it is now filed. -- Adrignola talk contribs 13:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)