Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Special Relativity/The interpretation of special relativity

Special Relativity/The interpretation of special relativity
This is a single person's idea that is not part of established knowledge of the subject, transferred to a separate sub-page by RobinH, after a discussion with that single person at Talk:Special Relativity/Simultaneity, time dilation and length contraction. This single person has publicized this idea on just about every self-submission web site that xe can find, it seems, in many cases citing this very sub-page as an authority, or at least as the primary source of the idea. See w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural mathematics for details. Uncle G (talk) 13:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] zomg delete - Will we never be rid of the crackpots? – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 14:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I went over this page and the paper that it references, and both of them are basically rubbish. Established counter-theories are one thing, this is a self-published work of nonsense. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 04:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The ideas in question are way off the mainstream but more importantly they are presented in an obscure way. The article does not even define "Natural Mathematics" and should be deleted. I had some vague hope that Ryskamp would introduce the "hole argument" and other philosophical/mathematical problems that led to GR during 1915 but all the article contains is Ryskamp's original vague statements. RobinH (talk) 10:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Almost original research but basically not very good. Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 00:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * --Panic (talk) 00:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks more like original commentary then anything else. Laleena (talk) 01:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)