Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Soft Thinking

Soft Thinking
No content after two years. --Derbeth talk 14:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC) Delete Hilarious. "First hand experiences of soft thinking: As Recorded in Modern Literature: Albert Einstein (1879-1955):" and "It's a little different. Soft as the relative inversion of hard." Must be a joke. Should be moved to Uncyclopedia. CatastrophicToad 23:40, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not going anywhere it seems. -Matt 15:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Eternal stub. --JMRyan 19:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, although we do need to come up with a stub policy for books that are making no progress. Unlike Wikipedia, it is unlikely that somebody is going to come back and finish writing a whole Wikibook that doesn't already have some substances.  Even very established and excellent Wikibooks like UK Constitution and Government don't get too much attention.  The trick is where to draw the line between a stub and a fairly good initial attempt at writing the book.  --Rob Horning 03:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep These stubs can be very useful, if someone ever comes and wants to write a book on the topic. Maybe we need a better way to archive stubs, but we should not be deleting them. --Kernigh 20:37, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I believe that we should keep stubs, but as Derbeth and Gabe Sechan mention below, "soft thinking" is not a usable topic for a book. I had assumed that "soft thinking" was a legitimate topioc, but my seach of Internet found nothing useful for this book. --Kernigh 22:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Do you think someone will continue with this book after two years? Take a look at the TOC, I don't even understand what this book is about. --Derbeth talk 21:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think there's a chance in hell it will be picked up. It doesn't even describe what its about.  It has the feel of one of those soapboxy philosophy books we get.  --Gabe Sechan 21:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Whiteknight (talk) (current) 15:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

''Consensus was to delete, so I did. This discussion will be archived in one week. -- LV (Dark Mark) 21:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)''