Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Set Theory

Set Theory/Introduction
Someone RFD'd this, and I completely agree. The introduction is badly written. As said in the discussion section of the aforementioned page: it is historically incorrect.


 * Everything in this section does not follow, and I feel a request for deletion is qualified. --Mathmogeek (discuss • contribs) 15:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * do you think anything here could be salvaged? I think personally it might be better to have some sort of introduction page. What could be done is anything inaccurate would be removed, just leaving whatever seems OK. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 10:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've removed that dubious claim about Cantor. Its often better to clean-up then discard. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 18:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)