Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Set That "Self Help" Book Down

Set That "Self Help" Book Down
I don't think this conforms to What is Wikibooks. It somewhat could fit in the philosophy section but I doubt that it will evolve in any kind of valid learning material. Probably a move to Wikiversity would work as to get it more balanced, see what you think... --Panic (talk) 10:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete in Wikibooks - I'm not sure whether it fits in the scope of Wikiversity - it is, well, not much of learning, but I don't think it fits WB:WIW, as it constitutes OR. Kayau ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 13:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I do not see the need for this to be deleted, it surely falls within the scope of wikibooks, it is a book... there are "Self Help" books that are not being deleted, perhaps you could explain a little more on what the actual issue is with it? The book is a work in progress so its not like its what is there is the finished project. I am just confused at what separates Category:Guide_to_Success_and_Fulfillment, its not even in the proper wikibooks format. ( --TravisMcCrea (talk) ) 99.196.218.197 (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The scope of Wikibooks is narrower than just "anything that's a book". See What is Wikibooks.  --Pi zero (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Please examine the policy and if you feel that any other books do not comply with it, nominate them. If you don't see them as having a chance to be improved into compliance.
 * I rarely nominate books for rfd. I do appreciate the effort put into it and I can go as far as stating that I agree with the POV expressed on the book, but as is, it doesn't belong in the Wikibooks project. --Panic (talk) 00:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * @Teamcoltra: No, there is nothing to separate Guide to Success and Fulfillment, and I'm nominating it right now. For the precise reason why it should be deleted please see WB:OR. Kayau ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 09:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Panic's last statement (starting with "I do appreciate...") would properly summarize my feelings about the book. --Duplode (talk) 11:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)