Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Nintendo Power Magazine

Nintendo Power Magazine
I really don't know why this is here. -- SB_Johnny | talk 10:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - This looks like it was created by a bot or a page-dumper. All red links, should be removed immediately. -within focus 21:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - As above. (I remembered to sign my comment this time :) ) Xania 22:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - it's not a bot... I queried the user, and he said he asked the magazine for permission, and thought this was the right place. I think we should wait for input from Garret or Minun on where it should go, then delete.-- SB_Johnny | talk 23:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * If he's simply including the text of the magazine, perhaps it should go to wikisource instead? I think there is alot of confusion between these two projects, especially for new users. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 02:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment - "ALL MATERIAL PRESENTED IS © NINTENDO POWER"? I'm no copyright buff, but does that contradict the GFDL, or does the permitted use make it "fair use"? Anyway, since the purpose of this project is to faithfully replicate the text of articles rather than to provide content to be improved upon, if this is indeed kosher I think Wikisource may be the best destination. GarrettTalk 02:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete & Comment - By adding content to the Wikibooks the author ( "he said he asked the magazine for permission" ) is giving some of the copyrights of a work to the EFF (by submitting it under the GFDL, remember that trademarks aren't affected by it's use) so the phrase is not completely correct and the only place it should be mentioned is in the authors page as it will be protected there, if this is not the case, just delete it. The user that has the permission and added the content to Wikibooks should be referred on that authors page (and Nintendo Power), if there is a copyright dispute he will have to answer it and provide a copy of the permission. In the grounds of copyright violation there seems to be no problem. As for the content, I think it would best fit WikiSource as the magazine was already published. --Panic 13:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Its been a week so: Vote closed vote is for: Delete. --darklama 17:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)