Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Molecular Biology

Molecular Biology
No activity for past 5 months. Has acheived half an introduction and a list in its 5 years of existence. Should be deleted to allow total rewrite if deemed suitable. }} Italienmoose (talk) 14:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * My understanding of policy is that stubs, even like this one, are kept to allow a point of crystallization for the possible eventual rewrite. Chazz (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Symbol comment vote.svg Comment Deletion policy states "In general, keep stubs that can be improved on, but delete stubs that are too narrowly defined or do not have a decent definition of what they are about.". – Adrignola talk contribs 18:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Well my reasoning is that there is no outline of the book at all. It's not really a stub that needs to be improved so much as one that needs to be started from scratch by an active contributor with somewhat more of a goal to achieve than whoever created the book back in 2005.  Italienmoose (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - IMO this falls into the 'stubs that are too narrowly defined or do not have a decent definition of what they are about' category. Kayau ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 00:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)


 * - Reverting my earlier keep vote. On inspection, I see the half introduction, but a list with one element is not even half a list. As both Kayau and Italienmoose suggest, there is not enough here to be a seed crystal; there is no direction, no plan, nothing useful. And looking at the change log, I see no substantive change in the past several years. Chazz (talk) 17:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)


 * - I agree with the above assessment. Thenub314 (talk) 10:58, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote.svg Transwiki at least the page Molecular Biology/Milestones to Wikiversity. I've done a quick search to see if the list is readily available and couldn't find one in any case it could be an easy and interesting project to work on. Even Wikipedia History of molecular biology doesn't provide a similar overview. --Panic (talk) 11:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)