Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Limitations of scientific research

Limitations of scientific research
OR and NPOV; might fit in WV's scope. Kayau ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 11:25, 29 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Symbol merge vote.svg Merge The Scientific Method part of it can be used to demonstrate how hypothesis are created. I particularly like the Megalodon issue (sharks are mostly cartilage so the lack of fossils). --Panic (talk) 12:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote.svg Transwiki Wikiversity then. --Panic (talk) 22:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and used some of the content (examples) on The Scientific Method, The Scientific Method/Components of the Method and The Scientific Method/Empiricism and Inductivism, remember to merge the history to one of them before deleting the page. --Panic (talk) 22:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * A custodian at Wikiversity needs to import it first; then I'll be happy to do that for you. – Adrignola talk 00:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Symbol comment vote.svg Comment Looks like they posted it here after it was deleted at Wikipedia, yet they did not do any examination of what is in Wikibooks' scope. Original research belongs at Wikiversity, and that's why it was deleted at Wikipedia. – Adrignola talk 19:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Should be fine at Wikiversity, --Abd (talk) 21:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Symbol comment vote.svg Comment Eight days after contributing the material at Wikipedia, and three minutes after creating Limitations of scientific research, the author created Limitations of Scientific Research. --Pi zero (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)