Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Kamalian

Kamalian
Original research. The front page clearly states that the language was invented in 2010, with nothing to make it notable. I get nothing doing a web search for this language and the only reference the book provides is a free website provider at Angelfire. I'm not opposed to a transwiki to Wikiversity. – Adrignola talk 21:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Appears to be nonsense. No attempt made to explain why the language uses such vocabulary or script.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 21:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg Delete OR. --Pi zero (talk) 22:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote.svg Transwiki Wikiversity. --Panic (talk) 22:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This seems to be a vanity page to me. Definitely OR, and should go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thenub314 (discuss • contribs)
 * delete. Panic, this falls into w:WP:NFT. Will be useless even in WV. Not salvageable. Kayau ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 12:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't agree. Any type of OR, contributed in good intention, would be right for Wikiversity. It is clear that the contributions took some effort, note that the project is very recent and is active, the only issue we have is the OR but the project seems salvageable. Did I miss something on the reference to w:WP:NFT ?  --Panic (talk) 15:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Technically the page at Wikipedia is a guideline and when it comes down to it, doesn't apply to Wikibooks. – Adrignola talk 16:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Kayau needs to be dewikified :) --Panic (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I know it's a Wikipedia guideline, but it applies here, along with a bit of w:WP:COMMON. If it's something that somebody made up with his or her friends in a day, why would anyone want to learn about it? It's worthless, even in WV. Kayau ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 01:05, 10 July 2010 (UTC)