Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/IHWIL/Databases/ON-LINE, IHWIL/Projects and IHWIL/TRAVEL

IHWIL/Databases/ON-LINE, IHWIL/Projects and IHWIL/TRAVEL
Doing some more orphan page cleanup. All of this content was added by a single user: User:Information Ecologist. As he is still semi-active (at least checking into Wikibooks every now and again) I'm throwing these pages up for a VfD instead of a speedy delete. Appears to be original research, and some machine generated text from some database of some sort. Primary project seems to be missing. Was this a part of an earlier cleanup and got missed? See also Talk:Information Ecology --Rob Horning 20:53, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

A related Wikibook that has a VfD tag is Morphometrics. VfD tag added by User:Naryathegreat in April but apparently missed getting a discussion. --Rob Horning 21:03, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete &mdash; the first three have to go because they appear to be original research, but I'll vote to delete Morphometrics too. Geo.T 01:01, 7 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment - I guess this is a bigger mess than I thought. There are several modules in the orphan bin that all connect to Information Ecology, leading me to believe that this page was deleted but the sub modules weren't for some reason.  There is original research and database dumps (aka the list problem that is an orphaned Wikimedia project) and a very strong POV in this whole Wikibook.  I also don't want to upset User:Information Ecologist, as it looks like he does have some interesting ideas.  It is just that some of the content here certainly is not suitable for Wikibooks.  --Rob Horning 05:04, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * OMG!!! I just found the mother of all VfD discussions.  I just unearthed a huge can of worms... seriously!  This discussion dates back to April 23rd when User:TUF-KAT deleted this discussion and didn't store it in an archive.  I just put the discussion into the archive for all to see again.  The following are pages to add to this discussion:


 * Information Ecology/Balance
 * Information Ecology/Case studies
 * Information Ecology/Logs
 * Information Ecology/Opening Page
 * Information Ecology/Table codes
 * Civil Society Report


 * For those that were involved back elsewhen, perhaps you can enlighten us on other discussion/thoughts besides those on the archive. --Rob Horning 05:44, 7 August 2005 (UTC)


 * What's in the archive is good enough. For me, the issue wasn't the topic per se, but the implementation of it. It could have been a topic to make a valid book out of, but it doesn't seem to have much hope. I think I'll continue to abstain. MShonle 06:43, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Deleted - This stuff was already voted for deletion, there's no need to vote again. It seems Andreas Ipp must have accidentally missed them. - Aya T C 15:55, 9 August 2005 (UTC)