Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/How To Build A Pykrete Bong

How To Build A Pykrete Bong
User 69.122.29.127 added a Speedy Delete tag to this page and requested it to be deleted. Given that the content obviously took some effort to put together, is not vulgar, and is instructional (even though in a potentially illegal area), I have changed it from a Speedy Delete to a VfD. I have no personal comments on whether this should be kept. - Lynx7725 7 July 2005 04:44 (UTC)


 * Keep This page does not seek to offend anyone. It offers correct, factual information. If someone has a personal problem with it, then they should simply ignore it, or edit the page and add a warning, etc. Any legal problems should be minor, as each person in their respective juristictions can make their own choices. Free speech should prevail. Abc123.


 * Keep I moved the majority of this text from Wikipedia (where it does not belong) to here and formatted it. I do not see any reason why it should be deleted. Additionally it serves as a safe and easy to construct alternative to the other home made bongs listed on the bong article. Additionally I do not see anything inherently illegal in the article. Triddle 7 July 2005 17:46 (UTC)


 * Keep It's nonsense to delete. If this article was entitled How to Build a Coffee machine would it even be considered for deletion? Certain countries laws notwithstanding, it's a perfectly reasonable set of instructions. Greenman 8 July 2005 12:37 (UTC)


 * Keep The article itself is not illegal; it is also well-written and informative. Charlie123 8 July 2005 12:50 (UTC)


 * Keep: Don't see the problem. - Aya 8 July 2005 18:11 (UTC)


 * Keep. I doubt I need to vote too, but I might as well. :) Just as How to search P2P networks wouldn't be technically illegal, neither is this. While I cannot think of a non-cannibis use for such a device, it's still fascinating info! But, ultimately, it's what you choose to do with the knowledge that's the problem. And, as said before, at least we're offering interested parties the safest (and no doubt clearest) construction method. Master Thief Garrett 9 July 2005 02:04 (UTC)


 * Keep: Nothing wrong with this article.--198.166.229.247 01:17, 14 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete: It does contain infomation about a controlled substance which is illegal.-- Masterjamie 19:47, 14 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep: Don't know whether the quality/tone/length are up to standard (I'm not a regular WikiBooks user) but it certainly shouldn't be deleted for its subject. -- Pete Verdon 86.131.57.14 20:46, 14 July 2005 (UTC)