Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Herstory and More

Herstory and More
I found this jibberish while exploring some of the old pages, and I'm surprised it hasnt been deleted yet. I was going to speedy this one, but i wantted to make sure i wasny ruffleing anybody's feathers. -- 22:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete - They had enough time to do something usefull it they realy wanted to start a book on a non mainstream religion. --Krischik T 16:03, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, despite nominator's speeling erorrs. ;-) -- LV (Dark Mark) 17:37, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hey! i'm allowed to typo every now and again. -- 17:57, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Gerard Foley 23:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This page is either a stub or nonsense. If it is a stub, then whoever put it here had enough time to expand it at least far enough that other contributors could start work on it. --Kernigh 18:13, 12 December 2005 (UTC) (If it was a stub, then it was a nonsense stub. This module looks like a candidate for speedy deletion. --Kernigh 01:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC))
 * herstory is the presentation of history with a deliberate bias. It is a bias that is intended to counter a perceived bias in the opposite direction, but is a bias nonetheless.  Our neutral point of view policy precludes bias in wikibooks, and precludes wikibooks which are deliberately intended to be biased. Delete. Uncle G 16:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If a "herstory" book was a history of women, then I would accept it, but if it was a biased history favoring women, it would violate NPOV and also the no-political-soapbox rule from WB:WIW. This module Herstory and More is neither book; it is only nonsense. --Kernigh 01:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete so little content it's no major loss --MShonle 16:48, 14 December 2005 (UTC)