Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Futurology

Futurology
A brief description of futurology, more appropriate for Wikipedia than here. They already have an entry, though. --132.161.189.31 19:49, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * comment -- While it currently has the scope of a wikipedia article, Future-Studies itself could be broad enough to fill a book. So, perhaps the issue of discussion is if this entry could be improved upon enough to become a book, or if it should be scrapped altogether to make room for another attempt at it later. MShonle 23:48, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this would make a very interesting book, if done as a survey of writings on this discipline in aesthetics. Keep. Lucidish
 * There is alot of interesting information on the topic that futurology. potential writers would need to be careful, however, that they stuck to common ideas, and didnt introduce any original research or postulation to the subject. I think we should keep this page, under the condition that somebody with knowledge on the subject expands it, so it doesnt remain just a stub. Keep. --Whiteknight 18:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * When I have more time to play with, I will definately work to expand this one. --Whiteknight T C E 14:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikipedia If I understand Transwiki correctly than we can transwiki it to Wikipedia and they can merge it with Futurology. That is, unless someone writes the chapters. --Kernigh 03:16, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Because Wikipedia already has an article here, there is nothing wrong with keeping Futurology here. It is brief, and that is a problem, but the correct fix is to wait for some contributor to start expanding it. --Kernigh 23:17, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep There are enough comprehensive Wikipedia articles on the various aspects of Futurology to more than fill a book. The Wikipedia article on Future Studies could easily be changed to link to all of these aspects, but isn't a book supposed to be more?  Isn't it supposed to use a bit of artistic flare to make the parts gel together and excite the reader about the content and implications?  --Zephram Stark 22:50, 13 November 2005 (UTC)