Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Fuji Finepix Real 3D W1

Fuji Finepix Real 3D W1
Possible OR and NPOV violations.  Kayau  David Copperfield MOBY DICK  the great gatsby 14:28, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

It would seem to fall under Original research, though where this OR document is a draft, maybe it is applicabile. As far as POV goes the book certainly needs cleanup. The book consists mostly of a wish list of features. But intermingled with the feature requests and opinions is information about how the camera operates. Though of course, this would fall under "self verifiable", which I cannot verify not having said camera. Assuming this information is correct maybe something of this book is worth salvaging, but maybe not. Thenub314 (talk) 16:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't see anything wrong with having a camera manual here. It's certainly at least as valuable (or potentially valuable) as the Motorola DVR book. NPOV violations should be addressed by fixing them rather than by deleting the book.  --Jomegat (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment - there's a new message saying that it's going to be moved, so why not delete?  Kayau  David Copperfield  MOBY DICK   the great gatsby  13:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I do wonder if that's a result of the RFD tag being added two days after its creation. -- Adrignola talk contribs 16:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Most Likely. Too bad the creators didn't take part in the discussion. Thenub314 (talk) 16:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Kayau did jump the gun on the issue, it is best to engage the Wikibookian or if patience is scarce to initiate a query (since this work doesn't really fit on our description of a Wikibook).
 * Another point is that the RfD lacked a real analysis of the situation (it was later added), we should expect others to examine the works but this expectation is a fallacy, since no one is forced to or will do it with any consistency, since we aren't working for the numbers this is also something that has to be considered when starting a RfD (and participating in one).
 * I'm in complete agreement with Jomegat, the front page of the work, at first it is just an empty stub but if you read the pages you'll see that it is really a wish-list with a stub attached (this is made clear by what was moved), there is no real problem with it and a query tag would have been probably enough to produce a reshape of the work. But since it was moved any possible fix that could be done is now remote. In any case the content still exist (elsewhere) and is still free for others to use so its not a loss. I'll change my vote if the creator wishes still to continue the work here or if Jomegat agrees that the Wish-list has no place on the stub, I don't mind keeping the stub for some time. --Panic (talk) 22:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)