Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Frankenstein

==Frankenstein==

There is no content written here, just an outline of chapters to comment on. No one seems to have edited it in about one year. Thenub314 (talk) 14:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like it's intended to be the framework for a class project... contact the main author and see what he intends? Chazz (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Adrignola has tagged his page (Thank you!), and there was no link to email him. But given that he only has 3 edits within 20 minutes of each other from over a year ago, I would be surprised if word reaches him.  But I'll keep my fingers crossed. Thenub314 (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Should stub-hood be grounds for deletion, if the book has potential to be developed into something worthwhile at some point down the road? I see two obstacles to this being developed by someone else later, neither of which strikes me as deletion-worthy:  the subject is specialized enough that there is a limited pool of people able to develop it (but that's true of many wikibooks); and potential developers wouldn't notice it because it isn't cataloged (but that can be fixed).  --Pi zero (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I wasn't sure what our exact policy is about old stubs. On the one hand over at the maintenance page it says "Old stubs may be removed or submitted to WB:VFD." However the deletion policy seems to say "In general, keep stubs" and mentions nothing about age. Stub-hood alone definitely shouldn't be grounds for deletion.  But do we want to allow for the possibility of deleting old stubs (Maybe one year simply isn't long enough to wait?)Thenub314 (talk) 18:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Doesn't this article resemble The Old Man and the Sea? Kayau (talk) 11:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg Delete I'm all for defending stubs but this is an empty stub from August 2008. It has no content nor any useful structure one could use to build upon, there will be no loss in deleting the thing... --Panic (talk) 15:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg Delete These annotated text stubs with only red links or empty heading sections only make Wikibooks look bad and disappoint readers who click on a book hoping for content, only to find none whatsoever. -- Adrignola talk contribs 01:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg Delete No meaningful content. --Swift (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)