Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Evolution Theory For Kids

Evolution Theory For Kids
More like Evolution Theory For Schizophrenics, this is more POV and original research from the author of Reggy and Jaccuse. Webaware talk 03:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The author, User:Ohadaloni, has indicated on my talk page that he/she will review NPOV and original research policies. Note also w:User:Ohadaloni, which appears to be the original source of this page. Webaware talk 04:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The author has now posted this on the book's talk page:
 * This textbook is locally abandoned
 * This textbook is now being developed at theora.com/msdb/etfk
 * A copy might see its way back to wikibooks once it reaches the level of accuracy desired by wikibooks guidelines
 * Webaware talk 13:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - More of the same. --Jomegat 04:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not a book. A collection of personal musings, perhaps. Still, not appropriate for Wikibooks or Wikijunior. -- xixtas talk 17:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - This page itself is not a textbook, but is instead a planning page for textbooks. Planning pages are valuable resources to any author, and so I don't think that we should delete these pages on sight. However, since we can't keep it in the main module namespace, we really should move it to User:Ohdaloni's user namespace instead. If the author intends to use these pages to write textbooks, we should encourage that (and simply correct the mistake of these pages being created in the wrong place). --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 18:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * move to userpage. ditto what whiteknight said. Hoogli 19:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to userpage. Agree with Whiteknight on this one. PurplePieman 23:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If you guys want to move it, shouldn't it go on the book's talk page instead of in user space? --Jomegat 01:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Either place might be acceptable. Either way, it's acceptable as meta-content, even if it isnt acceptable as book content. I think the user-space is the better choice because it's personal notes, and not really intended as part of a discussion. I won't argue with it if people want to move it to the talk page instead. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 02:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - ravings of a lunatic, or a really really bad attempt to plan a wikibook. I guess I'm not feeling charitable today. I suppose if it's actually going to be used as meta-content, then it could be moved to talk or user namespaces (although I don't think this looks like it will yield anything worthwhile) Mike.lifeguard 00:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Like the other work from this user, this is not textbook material.--Sir James Paul 12:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - I was going to vote keep, sharing Whiteknight view, but after reading a bit of the text I came to the conclusion that most of it doesn't make any sense or is even useful to be moved to another work. --Panic 15:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)