Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Category:Gardening pages

== Category:Gardening pages ==

The contents of this category have just been sitting there and it seems like, from the contents of Wikibooks talk:Pages to be transwikied/Gardening, that they are abandoned and other source material is being used to populate Wikisource, rather than the pages in the above category. At least that's the way I interpret it. Talk:Gardening also indicates that a new book would be started (Horticulture) that would not use the pages in this category. So they are no longer being transwikied and they have been dismissed as not acceptable for a merge. I humbly propose they be deleted rather than sit in limbo. -- Adrignola talk contribs 16:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. If the pages aren't useful for merger into other places like Horticulture they probably should be deleted. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 16:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. These pages has been in limbo a long time. Wikisource has had plenty of time to transwiki them if they were going to use them. The Horticulture book has also had plenty of time to adopt them if they were going to be used. The Gardening pages are part of a book that became public domain due to its age and that is why it was suppose to have been transfered to Wikisource to begin with from what I understand. --dark lama  11:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - most of the information in the old gardening book is quite out of date. It's interesting as a historical text, but not particularly useful as a textbook for modern gardening techniques. -- SB_Johnny  talk 14:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Get Rid Of It Anywhere, just not here Geoff Plourde (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)