Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Book of the Astronomy

Book of the Astronomy
Redundant to Astronomy. Any reason to keep it? @Germany Poul Ah can you explain how it is different and merits being a separate book? —Kittycataclysm (discuss • contribs) 18:14, 3 September 2023 (UTC) Germany Poul Ah (discuss • contribs) 18:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * When I first saw this nomination, I thought there may be some salvageable content, but no, it's just a "stubby outline" as it's called on Wikivoyage. I don't see the point of keeping a redundant article, but I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. --SHB2000 (discuss • contribs) 03:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Symbol keep vote.svg Keepno,no In this book, I want to discuss astronomy in detail, and it is a complete book of astronomy.In addition, this book is an encyclopedic book and is completely different from general astronomy books.


 * @Germany Poul Ah What do you mean that it's an encyclopedic book? Encyclopedic content is not permitted on Wikibooks. Moreover, it looks like a good amount of content you want to cover is already covered in Astronomy, and content that is not covered there can be added to it. —Kittycataclysm (discuss • contribs) 18:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't know, but if you want to delete it.I am no problem for delete. Germany Poul Ah (discuss • contribs) 03:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ —Kittycataclysm (discuss • contribs) 01:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)