Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Binding Io to C++

Binding Io to C++
This was marked as qr-em and became speedy but the magic isn't working at present so it didn't make it to the category. However I am not happy deleting this as a speedy anyway. Over to you folk -- Herby talk thyme 12:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

* Move: I think something like this would do well as an example in the C++ book, though I'm not sure if it's a legit program or not, someone who knows something about programming would need to check that. But I'm not sure if this topic is already covered in the existing C++ book, and/or if it has any examples of how to do it. Mattb112885 13:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Move : Will take a look if some content is fit for the C+++ Programming book, Is there a book on Io ? I'll give you some info later if so a merge would be good solution. --Panic 20:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As Darklama points out there is a similarity in the page Binding Io to C++(more code) and Programming:Io/Binding Io to C++ on the Io Programming book, the page content would fit to both books, but mostly useful to the Io, I propose it should be moved to that book namespace the contributors informed and let them chose how to go about it. --Panic 02:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: to me it looks like something intended to be part of Io Programming. I suppose that sort of answers the question of is there a book on Io. However that book looks like its more intended to be a tutorial from what it says. --dark [[Image:Yin yang.svg|12px]] lama 02:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge and Move, or Delete. : After looking at the edit history of Programming:Io/Binding Io to C++ and Binding Io to C++, I noticed they were both started by the same IP address on the same day with little difference in time, there is a good chance that both were created by the same individual. I think either both pages should be merged and moved into the Io Programming book or this copy deleted since it was created before the other copy and Programming:Io/Binding Io to C++ moved to Io Programming/Binding Io to C++ to fix the naming convention. --dark [[Image:Yin yang.svg|12px]] lama 02:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge: I was completely unaware of this, but if it is essentially the same content there's no point to having it twice, and yeah I think it makes more sense in a book on IO than one on C++ (not sure though, how relevant is it, for all the computer programmers out there?) Mattb112885 (talk) 03:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment - a Merge in this situation is not as easy, merge will require tagging and waiting, since the content seems to be at least some kind o duplication (it is about the same topic but the content is not equal and it is from the same editor it seems) a move to the IO book would address its "orphan" state, people on the book can then take care of the page or select what best fits their needs. --Panic 05:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Why don't we say we move it to IO then, this discussion's been dead for over a month! If there's no objections of course, do you think the current title would be fine? Mattb112885 (talk) 00:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)