Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/366 Photographs on the Beach

366 Photographs on the Beach

 * Delete This is not a textbook. Any content is more suited to Commons. Gerard Foley 17:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, I think we have a lack of books here on photography (or maybe i just havent seen all the photography books that we do have). I think it would probably be a better idea to merge this one into an existing photography book (with each photo getting some kind of explanation), or it should be transformed into a photography book by adding explanation. -- 17:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Take a look at Photography and at Talk:366 Photographs on the Beach. Uncle G 03:14, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I missed that book (i just didnt look hard enough). -- 15:05, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a textbook. --JMRyan 19:12, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as above, but ensure all photos have been transwikied to Commons. GarrettTalk 19:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki. Not only the photos, but also the page, should be transwikied, because Commons allows galleries of photos (see Commons:Commons:Gallery). --Kernigh 23:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the pages but transwiki free images to Commons. Guanaco 02:46, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete We have photography books, and this is just a listing. Images should be transwikied to commons. -- 15:05, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Transwikied to Commons:Transwiki:366 Photographs on the Beach. This transwiki shows that Commons already has all of the photos. If Wikibooks has copies of the photos, then an administrator can delete them. --Kernigh 18:10, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment It is not entirely intuitive that photobooks belong on commons.  Can we have a "photobooks bookshelf" which just tells people how to use commons for it?  Nyarlathotep 16:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Transwiki then Delete: A book on Photography even "Photography of Beach" would be ok if there where some tutorial like explanation on the photos available. As it is, it is not Wikibooks. --Krischik T 08:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)