Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/2600 Development

2600 Development & Subpage (copyvio)
I normally would have just copyvio'd this, but only the subpage is a copyvio so I feel a discussion (however brief) should be had before deleting the parent.

First off the subpage is a direct copy of this page so that's pretty cut-and-dry, and as the sole contributor hasn't made any edits on any other pages (or any since 2007 for that matter), and his intent seemed to be to just rip off that whole series of articles, there probably isn't much reason to believe anyone will develop it properly at this time. So I believe nothing is lost by deleting the parent page as well; since it is orphaned no links will be broken and this also provides a clean slate should someone decide to start on a non-infringing version of the book in the future. Xerol Oplan (talk) 02:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete . Agreed the only content is on the page that has been ripped off. The table of contents doesn't have anything that will help a future contributor.  Overall I think it is a speedy deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thenub314 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 23 November 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete. I see no reason to keep it around, especially in light of the copyvio and abandonment. --Jomegat (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Good catch.  That is a copyright violation indeed and there remains nothing useful on the root page as well. – Adrignola talk 22:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)