Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/2009 IB Physics Study Guide

2009 IB Physics Study Guide
This book is practically empty and has been superseded by IB Physics anyway. Being linked to 2009 means it is intrinsically obsolete too. Recent Runes (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Any possible use for 2009 IB Physics Study Guide/Atomic and Nuclear Physics? If that can be made use of it seems to me to be a pretty noncontroversial case for deletion.  – Adrignola talk 04:51, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator's statement.--Wisden (talk) 09:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Perhaps I was mistaken in supposing from their similar structures that the intention behind these two books is the same. The IB Physics book has an internal title of "IB Physics Review Guide" and seems more condensed than the small amount of material in the 2009 IB Physics Study Guide. Maybe we should just take the 2009 out of the title and accept that it is a framework with not much content. If any of the contributers could comment that would be useful. Recent Runes (talk) 19:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I only note one contributor,, who has not edited since November 2008. Getting any comments from contributors might be difficult.  I have, however, notified them on their talk page. – Adrignola talk 23:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete if not copyvio. Here, I think it might be useful to revision-merge this with the IB physics page on Atomic and Nuclear physics, then restore the current page there. The point would be to take all this material and connect it to the history of the newer and more complete book, in case someone wants to dig through it. I'm assuming they are different! Then the 2009 Book can be deleted. I don't see a reason for Wikibooks to keep old editions except in history. It would be nice to set up a parallel IB Physics course on Wikiversity, where students could study various topics, ask questions, etc. --Abd (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)