Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/'Spambot' pages

I've noticed quite a few pages recently which have all the markings of a classic spam page, except that they lack a link and hence the abuse filter does not catch them.


 * User:CaraMounts72944
 * User:TeresitaReynolds
 * User:EmeryShumack
 * User:JacquieTrask
 * User:SalEarnest5914 (I took a call on this and deleted it; the account name didn't match the name in the userpage.)
 * User:PYMNewton1230 (This was deleted by - the details were nonsensical - 43 year old in high school? The account is global-locked.)

I honestly want to delete them, but the sticking point is WB:AGF; I can't prove that they are a spambot with the generic information on the userpage, even though they seem like one.

What do you think?

Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 13:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Either oddballs or spam. All very odd and not contributing to the project. I know we have our policies but I would just gp ahead and delete them. It's not a biog deal - if the worst happens then they can be quickly undeleted. --ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_the_Isle_of_Mann.svg|15px]]talk 13:22, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Just speedy delete them. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 13:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * +1 JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 19:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete; also, two of them I'd be tempted to indefblock as spambots, as they've replaced their spambot-ish text with a completely different spambot-ish text. Note btw that AGF has no official status on Wikibooks; it was never adopted.  I've never decided just what I think we should do about AGF here, keeping in mind that Wikinews's Never assume is customized for news, while at the same time I think AGF has done a lot of damage to Wikipedia. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 20:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)