Wikibooks:Reading room/Administrative Assistance/Archives/2011/July

perbook css and js
Could someone put these codes to MediaWiki:Perbook/Turkish.js and MediaWiki:Perbook/Turkish.css pages, please?

Thanks in advance -Srhat (discuss • contribs) 19:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ Please check it is behaving as you expected - thanks QU TalkQu 19:38, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it works. The code doesn't work in preview, but i think it is because of the javascript code for "per book js and css" Srhat (discuss • contribs) 20:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Perbook css and js update request
I request that contents of MediaWiki:Perbook/Turkish.js and MediaWiki:Perbook/Turkish.css pages be changed with the following ones:

Srhat (discuss • contribs) 14:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ QU TalkQu 14:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Checkuser Request
Hi, can you do a CU on these accounts and block the source IP / IP range if appropriate please? All created close together, all SPAs used to create spam.



Thanks QU TalkQu 09:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed They all use the same IP. Also caught  (Search Engine Optimization) which wasn't blocked and also matched  and, the latter of which you blocked in May.  Hard-blocking for a six month period. – Adrignola discuss 15:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks QU TalkQu 17:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

VIP:
Has created insulting user pages for a couple of other users and trashed a few useful pages... Chazz (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Indef block. Nothing redeeming and this is likely to be a cross-wiki vandal. – Adrignola discuss 15:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

CU request
The last couple of users I have blocked seem to share a modus operandi. Perhaps they are the same person? Also, this guy (who I warned rather than blocked)
 * User:Termitecontrol11
 * User:Web75copywriters
 * User:Best76seller

I just find it suspicious that they are all linking to small businesses on a User page, and that the user name has a number in it. --Jomegat (discuss • contribs) 04:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Not from the same IP, but the last two are on the same ISP, with the last individual from a confirmed proxy, thereby suggesting a hard block of the IP is warranted. Since I went through the trouble of a check and there will be no collateral damage, underlying IP blocks for all. – Adrignola discuss 13:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)