Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Removal/Introduction to Paleoanthropology

Introduction to Paleoanthropology
This book has been on the featured books list for some time, and while it is decent I dont think it really deserves a place on this list right now. With some cleanup, it could be featured again, but right now i dont think this is a model of how other books should be. It uses a bad naming convention (which wouldn't be too too hard to fix, i suppose), it has section titles in ALL CAPS (which is personally annoying to me), and a significant amount of book content is comprised of bullets and lists. If we could get it cleaned up we could keep it on the list but I personally don't have the motivation right now to make all these changes throughout the entire book. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 21:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Keep The book looks fine to me. I'm not bothered by the formatting and far more interested in the actual content. Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 22:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Keep Is Xania's oppose above really a "support"? The book is very good in parts and needs the attention that being on "featured books" would provide. RobinH 10:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think you vote to oppose or support removal, which is somewhat confusing I know :). Mattb112885 (talk) 12:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops. Yes, I oppose removal.RobinH 09:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC
 * Perhaps you could avoid these issues by saying 'Keep' or 'Remove' instead -- Kowey 05:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC) [Well, I went in and was bold, do excuse me if it makes a mess]
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Remove - This book's naming convention issues alone make me not want to feature it. This is an old book that needs some time to be modernized. Also, RobinH, I changed your vote to what I am pretty sure you actually meant. -within focus 12:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Keep - this book appears to be exactly what it claims to be - an Introduction to Paleoanthropology, quite a reasonable one I thought. If it had claimed more than that, then I could understand not tagging it as a "good book", but as it stands, I reckon it's fine. Perhaps it will get dusted off and cleaned up a little with more prominent placement. Webaware talk 02:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Not Removed. No consensus to remove book from list. I hope people don't mind that i'm closing this one, even though i did nominate it. Since there will be no action, i want to send this to archive ASAP. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 17:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)