Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Removal/Basic Computing Using Windows

Basic Computing Using Windows
This book was featured 7 years ago and doesn't meet the criteria any longer. The content is completely outdated and the pages are almost empty. This book hasn't been updated as there is almost no contributions.

Also, Wikibooks had featured too many computing-related books and there are other computing-related books that are much better and not featured. We need a clean of this category. Ftiercel (discuss • contribs) 19:19, 21 June 2014‎ (UTC)

(added signature way too late)--Leaderboard 18:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * - Despite my moan about so many computing books I am reluctant to suggest removing featured book status from books in general. However this book is outdated and pages are rather short.  Much of the information is outdated especially for Win7/8.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_the_Isle_of_Mann.svg|15px]]talk 11:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It isn't too bad, but it is clearly insufficient. In all cases, it certainly isn’t “[a]ccurate, comprehensive, and concise enough to effectively teach and learn from in its current state”, and that’s the most important criterion in my opinion. --Mark Otaris (discuss • contribs) 21:29, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * - Definitely. Unless we can get it updated/filled out so that it does match the current criteria (quite a large task, although if other people are willing to do the same I can probably help out), it should have its featured status revoked. --SporkSauce (discuss • contribs) 09:37, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * - I've done quite a bit of reorganization on the book by adding headers and updating information to make it comparable with newer versions of Windows, but there's still quite a bit of work left on some chapters. I can help on the remaining chapters as well. The fact that if this is done fully , then the book can hold on to its Featured Book status. If you want , you can temporarily remove the status from the book while the reorganisation is going on , but then it'll take more time to get it back once it is complete.
 * do you see yourself continuing to improve this book more in the future? As right now, I don't think your activity levels say so. Thanks --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)