Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/Structural Biochemistry

Structural Biochemistry
In the past 4 years, my students of Structural Biochemistry at UC San Diego have been writing the wikibook. Without being perfect, it has reached a point in coverage, depth and quality that I feel confident that a student taking the course can do as well in the class consulting the wikibook, instead of purchasing an expensive book. We'll continue working on it. I believe that people interested in the field might find it useful too. Thank you, Hector Viadiu.


 * What a monumental book! It could use some navigation, but it sure appears to cover the subject in depth. --Jomegat (discuss • contribs) 03:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. The subject matter goes over my head in parts but this is clearly a pretty outstanding book and it is truly collaborative which is exactly the kind of Featured Book we need to promote on Wikibooks.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 10:06, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Not quite ready yet. Needs all pages checked and flagged and the typos and formating errors removed. I looked at just two pages at random. The first had several spelling mistakes and the second had a messed up piece of Wiki format that meant the section heading was displaying incorrectly. I'm fine with the content, but it needs to be tidier to be truly featured quality. Structural_Biochemistry/Organic_Chemistry is a good example page - some of the images are too big, there are bare URLs with no explanation pointing to Wikipedia, a reference section right in the middle of the page, etc. Someone basically needs to copyedit it. QU TalkQu 12:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * And it also needs someone to look at the image usage, and the text related to images. Many of the images are getting deleted from Commons resulting in text that refers to an image that is no longer there. QU TalkQu 08:32, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * We fixed formatting problems. Please, take a look.
 * Some of it, by no means all. Take this page - a missing image, not categorised, no reference section / reflist. As I said, it's got the content but every page needs reviewing because the errors in structure are significant QU TalkQu 08:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It has been over a year since anyone commented on this proposal. I don't have much knowledge about this topic and the project is still contributed to quite often.  Can anyone say if this book merits Featured Book status?  Were the suggested changes above made or not?--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 20:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It is still full of missing images and other problems... personally I'm not happy with it QU TalkQu 12:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)