Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/Movie Making Manual (2)

Movie Making Manual
A very thorough wikibook on how to make a movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoogli (discuss • contribs)


 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Strong Opposed Its structure is a mess, probably the worst case of not using a consistent naming convention that Wikibooks has right now, with only some pages starting to follow WB:NP. There is MMM:, MMM/, MMM_Page, Movie_Making_Manual: and Movie_Making_Manual_Page. Quite a few pages are stubs with little content. I imagine with all the name inconsistencies, there is probably a good chance of there being also lots of orphans and style inconsistencies. This book right now is a far cry from being what other people should considered a good example. --dark lama  00:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose - Categorization is funky too - pages are categorized in sections, and some are not in |Category:Movie Making Manual. Movie Making Manual/Certification for example. As well, there are notices that "this module belongs to MMM" which is redundant, since MW automatically adds a link up the hierarchy. Even worse, those notices aren't consistent. As for content, there is some duplication (which might be justified - I'm no expert, but is more likely a result of inconsistent naming of pages) and areas needing significant expansion. – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 00:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose This book has previously been nominate, and that nomination was closed as "not done" on 22 May. From a brief overview, it appears that none of the previous criticisms have been addressed between then and now. The naming convention problem is the most pressing, and I dont see how we can feature this book before that issue is resolved. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 00:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Not done Three opposition votes and no support votes in several days. This book should not be nominated again until it's naming convention issues are sorted out. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 18:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)