Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/Korean

Korean
I actually think that with some brief overrun of this book with grammar corrections and so on, this could actually be a featured book. I am learning Korean now and I have used this book today and I am very satisfied with its layout and explanations, and even links to Wiktionary for vocabulary. I nominate this book for featured. --Girdi (talk) 16:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose Levels 3, 4, 5, and 6 are almost entirely red-links, a handful of chapters in earlier sections are red as well. The pages in Levels 1 and 2 are just small vocabularly lists, and contain little prose (this may be intended, i cannot tell). Inter-page navigation is nice, but isn't properly applied to all pages. What is here is decently good, but there isn't nearly enough. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 00:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose There are too many red links. Laleena (talk) 02:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose Although what's there is of a fairly good standard, the book doesn't seem quite complete enough to be featured at this stage. It's a good start though. Helpfulstuffnz (talk) 03:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, then this is a comparison on other books and their standards. It makes me wonder then why Miskito and Quenya, especially Quenya are wikibooks. Not that I disagree with the above comments, I would oppose also. But I just judge featured books from the Miskito and Quenya books, which do not deserve the featured. --Girdi (talk) 22:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see what your opposition is to the Miskito book, it's a very good book in good condition with lots of content, few red links, etc. Can you elaborate further on what, precisely, makes that book unacceptable? Also, I think the majority of people are in agreement about the Quenya book, and I believe it will be un-featured soon. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 19:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Not done, no support after a fairly long nomination. Mattb112885 (talk to me) 23:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)