Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/Introduction to Analysis

Introduction to Analysis

 * [[Image:Symbol comment vote.svg|15px]] Comment A good start. The book is a bit thin and the theorems are not expanded with the explanations that distinguish a textbook from revision notes. Perhaps it could be featured when it has matured or it could be renamed Notes on Analysis. RobinH 08:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose. Wow. It's just a gigantic wall of text on every page, and the load times are terrible from all the equations that are getting rendered. Load times aside, I own books on analysis, and they are typically loaded with tables, images, etc to help break up the monotony. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 17:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol neutral vote.svg|15px]] Neutral Or rather abstain. I have no idea what this is about and very quickly confused so I'm probably not able to decide if this is a good book or not. Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 01:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol neutral vote.svg|15px]] Neutral I also have no clue, and I know looking at a published analysis book I'd be just as confused so it's best not to vote :). Mattb112885 (talk) 03:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose. I am the author of the book. Please please don't feature the book. The exposition is far from complete, quite a bit of the proofs are erroneous, etc. I am not sure about the future of the book. Maybe the scope of the book wasn't well focused. Currently I am more busy with Functional Analysis, which is a lot less messy but lacks the materials quite a bit. But In any rate, it is not a good idea to feature the book in the current state. -- Taku 07:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)