Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/First Aid

First Aid
This is the original reason I came here from Wikipedia, and I'm happy with it's state these days. I think it meets all the criteria; there are 2 things you should note. A)Navigation may not be ideal. B)The Advanced Topics section isn't complete, but isn't needed for an SFA/CPR-C course (which is what the intent was originally); think of that section as a series of extras. It does have a pdf version for Canada (use in the US should be fine too). – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 21:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support One thing that clearly does set this book above and beyond other books is precisely that goal and that plan. Wiki is not paper, and many people take that to mean that books will just grow forever like so much urban sprawl. It takes higher-then-average planning and organization to say "this is all we set out to do, and we've done it satisfactorily". I like this book. I like the templates and the formatting. The navigation may indeed not be 100% perfect, but you would be hard pressed to find any book (even a featured book) where it is. This is a good book, and certainly worthy of recognition. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 01:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support Yes, this book is definitely one of Wikibooks' finest. It is what Wikibooks strives to be. --Jomegat 02:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support Wow this is one big book! It seems very detailled, the information is correct from the one or two things I tried to check and the language is simple enough to understand for mere mortals also.  Good book. Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 22:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support - Still has its development areas but showcases a large work. -within focus 02:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Done 4 votes to support, plus a glowing nomination. This vote has been open for some time, and voter apathy is no reason to keep it from being featured. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 02:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)