Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/Ecology

Ecology

 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support - a consistent structure, leading the reader through the essentials of basic ecology. Perhaps it would be better titled "Basic Ecology" (as it is on its title page). Webaware talk 06:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol neutral vote.svg|15px]] Neutral Marshman made such a good start on this book but it has been left a bit thin. Where are all the other ecologists out there? RobinH 07:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose formatting is certainly not the worst i have ever seen (it's actuall quite good in some places), but the content is lacking. This book could benefit from more pictures, and less reliance on wikipedia articles. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 17:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support More could be done but I'm happy with the present condition of this book. Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 01:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose there are to many red links see featured books criterion #9. Zginder 14:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|15px| ]] Not done. 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral. No consensus to feature this book. Opposition cites lack of content and too many redlinks. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 23:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)