Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/Cell Biology

Cell Biology

 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose I feel like alot of the pages are very stub-like, and all the pages on the TOC are listed as "100% complete", which seems like a terrible over-estimation to me. There is also no inter-page navigation, which i find annoying. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 01:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose - many topics covered very lightly, and to my unscientific view (i.e. a fermenter, not a scientist), there seems to be some factual errors and/or misconceptions. Not one of our best. Webaware talk 06:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol neutral vote.svg|15px]] Neutral Its a shame no-one has added to this book since its early days.RobinH 07:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose Such important and complex topics deserve to be explained in more detail. Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 20:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose I think it's off to a great start but unfortunately not covered in sufficient depth, as Xania said. I could support this if the pages existing were more fleshed out. Mattb112885 (talk) 03:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Not done --Whiteknight (talk) 13:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)