Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/Applied Ecology

Applied Ecology

 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose Most pages consist of a "wall of text" that is difficult to read and not aesthetically pleasing. Content and navigation are decent, but formatting is a serious detraction. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 01:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support - on the basis of good content and good navigation. I agree that has a lot of words in a big stream, and could be laid out a little better (and perhaps have some images), but I'd still say that it's a "good book". Webaware talk 05:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose Difficult to read. Now I see how just a little formatting can make a big difference. Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 20:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose Only just oppose; a little bit more work, more sections and some images would make this suitable for featuring. RobinH 09:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Not done Three votes against, only one in support. opposition cites lack of readability and lack of relevant images. I'll archive this one eventually. --Whiteknight (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)